International Journal of
Computer Sciences and Engineering

Scholarly Peer-Reviewed Scientific Research Publishing Journal
Mapreduce- A Fabric Clustered Approach to Equilibrate the Load
Mapreduce- A Fabric Clustered Approach to Equilibrate the Load

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal Paper
Volume-4 , Issue-3 , Page no. 116-123, Mar-2016
Online published on Mar 25, 2016

Copyright © DEEPTI SHARMA , VIJAY B. AGGARWAL . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  XML View PDF Download  

IEEE Style Citation: DEEPTI SHARMA , VIJAY B. AGGARWAL, “Mapreduce- A Fabric Clustered Approach to Equilibrate the Load”, International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.4(3), pp.116-123, 2016.

MLA Style Citation: DEEPTI SHARMA , VIJAY B. AGGARWAL "Mapreduce- A Fabric Clustered Approach to Equilibrate the Load." International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering 4.3 (2016): 116-123.

APA Style Citation: DEEPTI SHARMA , VIJAY B. AGGARWAL, (2016). Mapreduce- A Fabric Clustered Approach to Equilibrate the Load. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 4(3), 116-123.
Abstract :
In recent years, load balancing is the challenging task which affects the performance in allotting the resources on homogeneous and heterogeneous cluster computing environment. This research proposes an enhancement in ACCS (Adaptively Circulates job among all servers by taking account of both Client activity and System load) policies by incorporating Map Reduce to overcome the problem in balancing the workload for resources. This technique provides simplicity and flexibility for data partitioning, localization and processing jobs as indicated by their present sizes and ranks the servers based on their loads by giving high priority to the smaller jobs. Map Reduce emphasizes more on high throughput of data on low-latency of job execution in a cluster to accomplish huge execution advantages. Trace driven simulations demonstrate the viability and robustness of Map Reduce under numerous different situations.
Key-Words / Index Term :
Load Balancing, Map Reduce, Web Server Clusters, AdaptLoad, ACCS
References :
[1] Gupta, V., Balter, M. H., Sigman, K., & Whitt, W. (2007). Analysis of join-the-shortest-queue routing for web server farms. Performance Evaluation,64(9), 1062-1081.
[2] Pai. V. S., Aron, M., Banga, G., Svendsen, M., Druschel, P., Zwaenepoel, W., & Nahum, E. (1998, October). Locality-aware request distribution in cluster-based network servers.InACM Sigplan Notices (Vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 205-216).ACM.
[3]Teo, Y. M., &Ayani, R. (2001). Comparison of load balancing strategies on cluster-based web servers. Simulation, 77(5-6), 185-195.
[4]Alonso-Calvo, R., Crespo, J., Garc’ia-Remesal, M., Anguita, A., &Maojo, V. (2010). On distributing load in cloud computing: A real application for very-large image datasets. Procedia Computer Science, 1(1), 2669-2677.
[5]Feng, H., Misra, V., & Rubenstein, D. (2005). Optimal state-free, size-aware dispatching for heterogeneous M/G/-type systems. Performance evaluation,62(1), 475-492.
[6]Harchol-Balter, M., & Downey, A. B. (1997). Exploiting process lifetime distributions for dynamic load balancing. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), 15(3), 253-285.
[7]Winston, W. (1977). Optimality of the shortest line discipline. Journal of Applied Probability, 181-189.
[8]Bonomi, F. (1990). On job assignment for a parallel system of processor sharing queues. Computers, IEEE Transactions on, 39(7), 858-869.
[9]Bachmat, E., &Sarfati, H. (2010). Analysis of SITA policies. Performance Evaluation, 67(2), 102-120.
[10]Riska, A., Sun, W., Smirni, E., &Ciardo, G. (2002). ADAPTLOAD: effective balancing in clustered web servers under transient load conditions. InDistributed Computing Systems, 2002.Proceedings. 22nd International Conference on (pp. 104-111). IEEE.
[11]Luis, A., &Azer, B. (2000). Load balancing a cluster of web servers. InProceedings of IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference (IPCCC‟ 00), ISBN: 0-7803-5979-
[12]Crescenzi, P., Gambosi, G., Nicosia, G., Penna, P., & Unger, W. (2007). On-line load balancing made simple: Greedy strikes back. Journal of Discrete Algorithms, 5(1), 162-175.
[13]Niu, Y., Chen, H., Hsu, F., Wang, Y. M., & Ma, M. (2007, February). A Quantitative Study of Forum Spamming Using Context-based Analysis.InNDSS.
[14]Garg, A. (2015). A Framework to Optimize Load Balancing to Improve the Performance of Distributed Systems. International Journal of Computer Applications, 122(15).
[15]Psaras, I., &Mamatas, L. (2011). On demand connectivity sharing: Queuing management and load balancing for user-provided networks. Computer Networks, 55(2), 399-414.
[16] Gupta, R. K., & Ahmad, J. (2014). Dynamic Load Balancing By Scheduling In Computational Grid System. Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems, 5(6), 39-45.
[17] Ungureanu, V., Melamed, B., &Katehakis, M. (2008). Effective load balancing for cluster-based servers employing job preemption. Performance Evaluation, 65(8), 606-622.