Open Access   Article Go Back

360 Degree Performance Appraisals of Students: a Demographic Study

A. Jain1 , A. M. Hyde2 , B. Sharma3

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal Paper
Volume-06 , Issue-09 , Page no. 8-14, Nov-2018

CrossRef-DOI:   https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6si9.814

Online published on Nov 20, 2018

Copyright © A. Jain, A. M. Hyde, B. Sharma . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

How to Cite this Paper

  • IEEE Citation
  • MLA Citation
  • APA Citation
  • BibTex Citation
  • RIS Citation

IEEE Style Citation: A. Jain, A. M. Hyde, B. Sharma, “360 Degree Performance Appraisals of Students: a Demographic Study,” International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.06, Issue.09, pp.8-14, 2018.

MLA Style Citation: A. Jain, A. M. Hyde, B. Sharma "360 Degree Performance Appraisals of Students: a Demographic Study." International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering 06.09 (2018): 8-14.

APA Style Citation: A. Jain, A. M. Hyde, B. Sharma, (2018). 360 Degree Performance Appraisals of Students: a Demographic Study. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 06(09), 8-14.

BibTex Style Citation:
@article{Jain_2018,
author = {A. Jain, A. M. Hyde, B. Sharma},
title = {360 Degree Performance Appraisals of Students: a Demographic Study},
journal = {International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering},
issue_date = {11 2018},
volume = {06},
Issue = {09},
month = {11},
year = {2018},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {8-14},
url = {https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_spl_paper_view.php?paper_id=489},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6i9.814}
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}

RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
DO = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6i9.814}
UR - https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_spl_paper_view.php?paper_id=489
TI - 360 Degree Performance Appraisals of Students: a Demographic Study
T2 - International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering
AU - A. Jain, A. M. Hyde, B. Sharma
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/11/20
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 8-14
IS - 09
VL - 06
SN - 2347-2693
ER -

           

Abstract

Performance appraisal is one of the functions of Human Resource Management for measuring and evaluating the performance of the employees in an organization over a period of time as against the set standards. Performance appraisal (PA) which is a process used by the firms to evaluate their employees’ efficiency and productivity, was initially carried out by the supervisors. 360 Degree Performance Appraisal is also identified as, is feedback which comes from different groups of reviewer who socialize with evaluated employees. For the most part this feedback will incorporate assessment from subordinates, colleagues, and his superior and in addition without anyone else specifically. It can likewise incorporate, now and again, feedback from external sources, for example, customers and suppliers or other intrigued stakeholders. 360 degree criticism ought to be utilized solely for advancement purposes, or ought to be utilized for examination purposes too. 360 degree feedback is utilized for two purposes i.e. assessment and development. In this Research Primary data has been collected from students of various streams of Indore Division through using a Self Designed Questionnaire. T-Test and One way ANOVA test have been applied for the purpose of study A Demographic Study on Factors Determining 360 Degree Performance Appraisals of Students. Normality and Reliability have been checked. The purpose is to find out the contribution of 360 degree feedback to the students. Various benefits and shortcoming are listed down while introducing this method in the organization.

Key-Words / Index Term

360 Degrees Appraisal, feedback, Organization, People, Assessment, Development, Career development, Performance Appraisal, Organizational Objectives

References

[1]. Allinson, C. W, (1977) “Training In Performance Appraisal Interviewing: An Evaluation Study”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol.14, Issue 2, pp.179–191.
[2]. Arthur G. Bedeian, (1976) “Rater Characteristics Affecting the Validity of Performance Appraisals”, Journal of Management, Vol.2, pp. 37-45
[3]. Birte Asmu, (2008) “Performance Appraisal Interviews”, Journal of Business Communication, Volume 45, Number 4, pp. 408-429.
[4]. Christopher S, Miller, Joan A. Kaspin, and Michael H. Schuster, (1990) “The impact of performance appraisal methods on age discrimination in employment act cases”, Personnel Psychology, Vol.43, Issue 3, pp. 555-578.
[5]. Clinton O. Longenecker , Nick Nykodym, (1996) “Public sector performance appraisal effectiveness: a case study”, Public Personnel Management, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 151-164.
[6]. Clinton O. Longenecker and Laurence S. Fink, (1999) “Creating Effective Performance Appraisals”, Industrial Management,
[7]. Douglas Cederblom, (1982) “The performance appraisal interview: A review, implications and suggestions”. The Academy of Management Review, Vol.7 (2), 219-227.
[8]. Glenn R. Herbert and Dennis Doverspike, (1990) "Performance Appraisal in the Training Needs Analysis Process: A Review and Critique," Public Personnel Management, Vol.19, No.3, 253-270.
[9]. Hai Ming Chen and Peng Chuan Fu, (2008) “A systematic framework for performance appraisal and compensation strategy”, Human Systems Management Vol.27, pp. 161–175
[10]. IRACST- International Journal of Research in Management & Technology (IJRMT), ISSN: 2249-9563, Vol.6, No.1, Jan-Feb 2016 Page No. 46-50.
[11]. Jan P. Muczyk and Myron Gable, (1987) “Managing sales performance through a comprehensive performance appraisal system”, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol.VII, pp.41-52.
[12]. John T. Addison and Clive R. Belfield, (2008) “The Determinants of Performance Appraisal Systems: A Note (Do Brown and Heywood’s Results for Australia Hold Up for Britain?)”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol.46, No.3, pp. 521–531.
[13]. Kleiman, L. S. and Durham, R. L., (1981) “Performance Appraisal, Promotion and the Courts: A Critical Review”, Personnel Psychology, Vol.34, Issue 1, pp. 103–121.
[14]. Michael M. Harris and David E. Smith, (1995) “A field study of performance appraisal purpose: research- versus administrative- based ratings”, Personnel Psychology, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp.151-160.
[15]. Richard Herdlein, Hasso Kukemelk and Kilno Turk,(2008) “A survey of academic officers regarding performance appraisal in Estonian and American universities”, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol.30, No. 4, pp. 387–399.
[16]. Robert L. Taylor and William D. Wilsted, (1974) “Capturing Judgment Policies: A Field Study of Performance Appraisal”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol.17, No. 3, pp. 440-449.
[17]. Ron S. Kenett, David A. Waldman and Spencer B. Graves, (1994) “Process performance appraisal systems: a working substitute to individual performance appraisal”, Total Quality Management, Vol.5, NO. 5, pp. 267-280.
[18]. Sanwong, K (2008) “The Development of a 360-Degree Performance Appraisal System: A University Case Study”, International Journal of Management, Vol.25, No.1, pp.16-21.
[19]. Sita C. Amba-Rao; Joseph A. Petrick; Jatinder N. D. Gupta; Thomas J. Von Der Embse, (2001) “Comparative performance appraisal practices and management values among foreign and domestic firms in India”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp.60-89.
[20]. Vlasis Stathakopoulos, (1997) “Effects of performance appraisal systems on marketing managers”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol.13, pp.835-852.