Open Access   Article Go Back

Evolution of Machine Learning Methods for Memography Classification

R. Swathi1 , R. Seshadri2

  1. CSE, Name of College Sri Venkateswara University,Tirupati,India.
  2. CSE, Name of College Sri Venkateswara University,Tirupati,India.

Section:Review Paper, Product Type: Journal Paper
Volume-6 , Issue-3 , Page no. 499-502, Mar-2018

CrossRef-DOI:   https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6i3.499502

Online published on Mar 30, 2018

Copyright © R. Swathi, R. Seshadri . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

How to Cite this Paper

  • IEEE Citation
  • MLA Citation
  • APA Citation
  • BibTex Citation
  • RIS Citation

IEEE Style Citation: R. Swathi, R. Seshadri, “Evolution of Machine Learning Methods for Memography Classification,” International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.6, Issue.3, pp.499-502, 2018.

MLA Style Citation: R. Swathi, R. Seshadri "Evolution of Machine Learning Methods for Memography Classification." International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering 6.3 (2018): 499-502.

APA Style Citation: R. Swathi, R. Seshadri, (2018). Evolution of Machine Learning Methods for Memography Classification. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 6(3), 499-502.

BibTex Style Citation:
@article{Swathi_2018,
author = {R. Swathi, R. Seshadri},
title = {Evolution of Machine Learning Methods for Memography Classification},
journal = {International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering},
issue_date = {3 2018},
volume = {6},
Issue = {3},
month = {3},
year = {2018},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {499-502},
url = {https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=1837},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6i3.499502}
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}

RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
DO = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6i3.499502}
UR - https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=1837
TI - Evolution of Machine Learning Methods for Memography Classification
T2 - International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering
AU - R. Swathi, R. Seshadri
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/03/30
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 499-502
IS - 3
VL - 6
SN - 2347-2693
ER -

VIEWS PDF XML
596 401 downloads 311 downloads
  
  
           

Abstract

In Healthcare and Biomedical sectors, the data is growing more and more, analysing of such medical data accurately will benefits disease detection and early diagnosis. Mammography is the process toward utilizing low-energy X-rays to look at the human cancer for diagnosis and screening. The objective of mammography is the early detection of breast cancer , ordinarily through recognition of trademark masses or macrocalcifications. Low positive predictive model of mammogram will lead to more no unnecessary biopsies with benign outcomes. The accuracy and reliability of prediction mechanisms is important to reduce the number of biopsies. In this paper, we look at different machine learning algorithms with a specific end goal to predict the performance accuracy. By comparing different algorithms, it has been concluded that deep learning algorithm and Revisiting SVM have highest prediction accuracy among other algorithms studied. Experimental results show this prediction approach is more effective.

Key-Words / Index Term

Deep learning, Machine Learning, Revisiting SVM, SVM

References

[1]. K. Nigam, A. Mccallum and T. Mitchell, “Text classification from labelled and unlabelled documents using EM”, Machine Learning, vol. 39, no. 2.
[2]. W. Zhang, Y. Yang and Q. Wang, “Handling missing data in software effort prediction with naive Bayes and EM algorithm”, PROMISE ’11, Banff, Canada, September 20-21,.
[3]. C. L. Martín, A. Chavoya and M. E. M. Campaña, “Use of a Feed Forward Neural Network for Predicting the Development Duration of Software Projects”, 2013 12th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications.
[4]. S. K. Shevade, S. S. Keerthi, C. Bhattacharyya and K. R. K. Murthy, “Improvements to the SMO Algorithm for SVM Regression”, IEEE Transactions ON Neural Networks, vol. 11, no. 5, September.
[5]. Short RD, Fukunaga K. The optimal distance measure for nearest neighbour classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1981; 27:622-7. 10.1109/TIT.1981.1056403
[6]. Weinberger KQ, Saul LK. Distance metric learning for large margin nearest neighbour classification. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 2009; 10:207- 44.
[7]. Cost S, Salzberg S. A weighted nearest neighbour algorithm for learning with symbolic features. Machine Learning 1993; 10:57-78. 10.1007/BF00993481
[8]. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning. 2001; 45:5-32. 10.1023/A:1010933404324
[9]. Zhang Z. Too much covariates in a multivariable model may cause the problem of overfitting. J Thorac Dis 2014;6: E196-7.
[10]. Lantz B. Machine learning with R. 2nd ed. Birmingham: Packt Publishing; 2015:1.
[11]. J. A. Lopez, J. L. Berral, R. Gavalda and J. Torres, “Adaptive on-line software aging prediction based on machine learning”, in Procs. 40th IEEE/IFIP Intl. Conf. on Dependable Systems and Networks, June 28, July 1, pp. 497-506.
[12]. Y. Wang, and I. H. Witten, “Inducing Model Trees for Continuous Classes”, the European Conf. on Machine Learning Poster Papers.