— A wireless Sensor Networks and specifically Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks (WMSN) assume a key part in numerous Internet of Things (IoT) applications, including mixed media observation, brilliant city activity shirking and control frameworks, propelled medicinal services, and so forth. In such frameworks, sensor nodes are incorporated with cameras as well as amplifiers to catch video or sound substance identified with assorted occasions. Numerous WMSN applications require novel system answers for help mixed media content conveyance at high quality of Service (QoS) levels. In any case, significantly more WMSN applications are worried about the vitality effectiveness because of the constraints of the batteries which prepare the sensor hubs. In proposed inquire about, an energy efficient and QoS flood control conspire for solid interchanges over WMSNs (EEQFC). The proposed arrangement makes utilization of QoS criticism and current battery vitality levels of sensor hubs keeping in mind the end goal to adjust sending information rate. They utilize fortification learning by defining the issue regarding a Markov Decision Process and tackle it utilizing the Q-Learning system. The proposed EEQFC is approved utilizing re-enactments and is contrasted and great MDP and UAMD, another clog control calculation for Wireless Sensor Networks. The outcomes indicate how EEQFC beats alternate arrangements under high and low system stack.

Energy efficient, Quality of service, Flood control

[1] K. Wu, Y. Gao, F. Li, and Y. Xiao, “Lightweight deployment-aware scheduling for wireless sensor networks,” Mobile networks and applications, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 837–852, 2005.
[2] A.Udenze and K. McDonald-Maier, “Partially observable Markov decision process for transmitter power control in wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the ECSIS Symposium on Bio-inspired Learning and Intelligent Systems for Security. IEEE, 2008, pp. 101–106.
[3] A.Kobbane, M. Koulali, H. Tembine, M. Koutbi, and J. Ben-Othman, “Dynamic power control with energy constraint for multimedia wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications. IEEE, 2012, pp. 518–522.
[4] K. Chatterjee, R. Majumdar, and T. A. Henzinger, “Markov decision processes with multiple objectives,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science. Springer, 2006, pp. 325–336.
[5] K. Etessami, M. Kwiatkowska, M. Y. Vardi, and M. Yannakakis, “Multi-objective model checking of Markov decision processes,” in Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems.Springer, 2007, pp. 50–65.
[6] K. Chatterjee, “Markov decision processes with multiple long-run average objectives,” in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science. Springer, 2007, pp. 473–484.
[7] M. Di Francesco, S. K. Das, and G. Anastasi, “Data collection in wireless sensor networks with mobile elements: A survey,” ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 7, 2011.
[8] S. Zhan and J. Li, “Active cross-layer location identification of attackers in wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology, vol. 3. IEEE, 2010, pp. 240–244.
[9] G. K. Atia, V. V. Veeravalli, and J. A. Fuemmeler, “Sensor scheduling for energy-efficient target tracking in sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 4923–4937, 2011.
[10] W.-L. Yeow, C.-K. Tham, and W.-C. Wong, “Energy efficient multiple target tracking in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 918–928, 2007.
[11] M. A. Alsheikh, S. Lin, D. Niyato and H. P. Tan, ”Machine Learning in Wireless Sensor Networks: Algorithms, Strategies, and Applications,” in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1996-2018, Fourthquarter 2014.
[12] M. Abu Alsheikh, D. T. Hoang, D. Niyato, H. P. Tan and S. Lin, “Markov Decision Processes With Applications in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey,” in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1239-1267, thirdquarter 2015.
[13] B. N. Trinh, L. Murphy and G. M. Muntean, “Uplink Adaptive Multimedia Delivery (UAMD) scheme for Video Sensor Network,” 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), Paris, 2017, pp. 85-90.
[14] B. N. Trinh, L. Murphy and G. M. Muntean, “Enhanced scheme for adaptive multimedia delivery over wireless video sensor networks,” 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB), Cagliari, 2017, pp. 1-7.
[15] R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, “Reinforcement Learning - An Introduction”, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 2016.
[16] C.-Y. Wan, S. B. Eisenman, and A. T. Campbell, “CODA: Congestion Detec- tion and Avoidance in Sensor Networks,” Proc. ACM Sensys ’03, Los Ange- les, CA, Nov. 5–7, 2003.
[17] C. Wang, K. Sohraby, V. Lawrence, B. Li, and Y. Hu, “Priority based congestion control in wireless sensor networks,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Sensor Netw. Ubiquitous, Trustworthy Comput., 2006, vol. 1, pp. 22–31.
[18] B. Hull, K. Jamieson, and H. Balakrishnan, “Mitigating Congestion in Wireless Sensor Networks,” Proc. ACM Sensys ’04, Baltimore, MD, Nov. 3–5, 2004.
[19] Y. G. Iyer, S. Gandham, and S. Venkatesan, “STCP: A Generic Transport Layer Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Proc. IEEE ICCCN 2005, San Diego, CA, Oct. 17–19, 2005.