Data stream classification has been a wide studied detailed examination downside in recent years. The vigorous and evolving nature of knowledge streams needs economical and effective techniques that square measure considerably completely different from static data classification techniques. The foremost strenuous and well studied characteristics of information streams square measure its infinite length and concept-drift. Information stream classification poses several challenges to the info mining community. All through this paper, we enclose a affinity to talk four such major dispute namely, IL, CDI, CE, and FE. Since an information stream is in theory IL Model (Infinite long), it`s impractical to store and use all the historical information for coaching. CD Model (Concept-Drift) could be a common development in information streams that happens as a result of changes within the underlying ideas. CE (Concept-Evolution) happens as a results of new categories evolving within the stream. Feature-evolution (FE) Model could be a oft occurring method in several streams, reminiscent of text streams, within which new options seem because the stream progresses. Most existing information stream classification techniques address solely the primary challenges, and ignore the latter two. The paper proposes associate degree ensemble classification framework, wherever every classifier is provided with a unique class detector, to handle CE.

Outlier Detection, Big Data Mining, Concept Drift (CF)t, Concept Evaluation(CE),Feature Evaluation (FE), CP GraphModel.

[1] C. C. Aggarwal. On classification and segmentation of massive audio data streams. Knowl. and Info. Sys., 20:137–156, July 2009.
[2] C. C. Aggarwal, J. Han, J. Wang, and P. S. Yu. A framework for on-demand classification of evolving data streams. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng, 18(5):577–589, 2006.
[3] A. Bifet, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, R. Kirkby, and R. Gavald. New ensemble methods for evolving data streams. In Proc. SIGKDD, pages 139–148, 2009.
[4] S. Chen, H. Wang, S. Zhou, and P. Yu. Stop chasing trends: Discovering high order models in evolving data. In Proc. ICDE, pages 923–932, 2008.
[5] W. Fan. Systematic data selection to mine concept-drifting data streams. In Proc. SIGKDD, pages 128–137, 2004.
[6] J. Gao, W. Fan, and J. Han. On appropriate assumptions to mine data streams. In Proc. ICDM, pages 143–152, 2007.
[7] S. Hashemi, Y. Yang, Z. Mirzamomen, and M. Kangavari. Adapted one-versus-all decision trees for data stream classification. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng, 21(5):624–637, 2009.
[8] G. Hulten, L. Spencer, and P. Domingos. Mining timechanging data streams. In Proc. SIGKDD, pages 97–106, 2001.
[9] I. Katakis, G. Tsoumakas, and I. Vlahavas. Dynamic feature space and incremental feature selection for the classification of textual data streams. In Proc. ECML PKDD, pages 102–116,2006.
[10] I. Katakis, G. Tsoumakas, and I. Vlahavas. Tracking recurring contexts using ensemble classifiers: an application to email filtering. Knowledge and Information Systems, 22:371–391, 2010.
[11] J. Kolter and M. Maloof. Using additive expert ensembles to cope with concept drift. In Proc. ICML, pages 449–456, 2005.
[12] D. D. Lewis, Y. Yang, T. Rose, and F. Li. Rcv1: A new benchmark collection for text categorization research. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5:361–397, 2004.
[13] X. Li, P. S. Yu, B. Liu, and S.-K. Ng. Positive unlabeled learning for data stream classification. In Proc. SDM, pages 257–268, 2009.
[14] M. M. Masud, Q. Chen, J. Gao, L. Khan, J. Han, and B. M. Thuraisingham. Classification and novel class detection of data streams in a dynamic feature space. In Proc. ECML PKDD, volume II, pages 337–352, 2010
[15] M. M. Masud, Q. Chen, L. Khan, C. Aggarwal, J. Gao, J. Han, and B. M. Thuraisingham. Addressing concept-evolution in concept-drifting data streams. In Proc. ICDM, pages 929–934,2010.