Open Access   Article Go Back

Efficiency Comparison of Different Modulation Scheme for 5G Application Using Simulation Approach

K.O. Ogbeide1 , O.J. Daramola2

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal Paper
Volume-9 , Issue-11 , Page no. 10-18, Nov-2021

CrossRef-DOI:   https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v9i11.1018

Online published on Nov 30, 2021

Copyright © K.O. Ogbeide, O.J. Daramola . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

How to Cite this Paper

  • IEEE Citation
  • MLA Citation
  • APA Citation
  • BibTex Citation
  • RIS Citation

IEEE Style Citation: K.O. Ogbeide, O.J. Daramola, “Efficiency Comparison of Different Modulation Scheme for 5G Application Using Simulation Approach,” International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.9, Issue.11, pp.10-18, 2021.

MLA Style Citation: K.O. Ogbeide, O.J. Daramola "Efficiency Comparison of Different Modulation Scheme for 5G Application Using Simulation Approach." International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering 9.11 (2021): 10-18.

APA Style Citation: K.O. Ogbeide, O.J. Daramola, (2021). Efficiency Comparison of Different Modulation Scheme for 5G Application Using Simulation Approach. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 9(11), 10-18.

BibTex Style Citation:
@article{Ogbeide_2021,
author = {K.O. Ogbeide, O.J. Daramola},
title = {Efficiency Comparison of Different Modulation Scheme for 5G Application Using Simulation Approach},
journal = {International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering},
issue_date = {11 2021},
volume = {9},
Issue = {11},
month = {11},
year = {2021},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {10-18},
url = {https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=5412},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v9i11.1018}
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}

RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
DO = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v9i11.1018}
UR - https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=5412
TI - Efficiency Comparison of Different Modulation Scheme for 5G Application Using Simulation Approach
T2 - International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering
AU - K.O. Ogbeide, O.J. Daramola
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/11/30
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 10-18
IS - 11
VL - 9
SN - 2347-2693
ER -

VIEWS PDF XML
275 456 downloads 153 downloads
  
  
           

Abstract

The aim of this research is to investigate performance metrics such as bit-error-rate (BER), throughput, spectral efficiency, peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) and one-way latency for the different modulation scheme used in a 5G wireless network. The Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK), 16QAM (16-Quadrature Amplitude Modulation), 64QAM and 256QAM were studied for signal to noise ratio (SNR) ranging from -10dB to 20dB at intervals of 5dB. It was experimentally demonstrated through MATLAB simulation that the efficiency of the 5G network in various aspects depends on the modulation coding scheme (MCS) used. The QPSK MCS exhibited the best performance in BER with 0 bps at all SNRs, throughput of 100%, PAPR of 3dB and one-latency of 1.75ms. However, it suffered a major drawback in spectral efficiency because of the small modulation order. The 256QAM might be the choicest of all considering its number of bits per symbol mapping when the SNR is around 10 to 15dB. However, it performs very poorly when the signal to noise ratio is low, largely due to the reduced hamming distance between the symbols, making it prone to Inter Symbol Interference (ISI). At the worst SNR of -10dB, 256QAM has a BER of 0.5008bps, 0% throughput, maximum PAPR of 7dB and latency of 5.25ms with a block error probability of 1. The 64QAM modulation scheme exhibits a good compromise at a reasonable SNR of 5dB. It has a BER of 0.0, achieves a throughput of 100% and a spectral efficiency of 0.0295 bps/Hz.

Key-Words / Index Term

Modulation, fifth generation, performance, bit-error-rate, throughput, spectral efficiency, peak-to-average power ratio, one-way latency

References

[1] Y. Yang, X. Jing, S. Guang and W. Cheng-Xiang, “5G Channel Test Requirement,” in 5G Wireless Systems Simulation and Evaluation Techniques, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, p. 303, 2018.
[2] T. S. Rappaport, S. Sun, R. Mayzus, H. Zhao, Y.Azar, K. Wang, G. N.Wong, J. K. Schulz, M. Samimi and F. Gutierrez, “Millimeter wave mobile communications for 5G cellular: It will work!,” IEEE Access, vol. 1, pp. 335-349, 2013.
[3] Z. Pi and F. Khan, “An introduction to millimeter-wave mobile broadband systems,” IEEE Communication, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 101-107, 2011.
[4] P. Banelli, S. Buzzi, G. Colavolpe, A. Modenini, F. Rusek and A. Ugolini, “Modulation Formats and Waveforms for 5G Networks: Who Will Be the Heir of OFDM?,” IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, vol. 1, pp. 11-13, 2014.
[5] L. Atzori, A. Iera and G. Morabito, “The Internt of Things: A survey,” Elsevier Computer Network, vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 2787-2805, 2010.
[6] G. Wu, S. Talwar, K. Johnsson, N. Himayat and K. D. Johnson, “M2M: From mobile to embedded Internet,” IEEE Communication Magazine, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 36-43, 2011.
[7] G. Fettweis, “The tactile Internet: Appllications and challenges,” IEEE Vehicle Technology Magazine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 64-70, 2014.
[8] S. Ghosh, “Performance Evaluation of Different Coding and Modulation Scheme in LTE Using Different Bandwidth and Correlation Levels.,” Wireless Pers Commun, vol. 86, p. 563–578, 2016.
[9] S. Tholhath and T. C. Tiong, “Performance Analysis for LTE Wireless Communication,” IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 78, pp. 1-9, 2015.
[10]E. Ayanoglu, “5G Today: Modulation Technique Alternatives,” in International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), Invited Symposium, Kauai, Hawaii, USA, 2016.
[11]D. D. Sharma and K. D. Singh, “PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF MODERN MODULATION TECHNIQUES FOR 5G NETWORKS,” International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 3-5, 2018.
[12]T. Rajput and M. L. Jatav, “Review Paper on Massive MIMO Systems with Channel State Information,” International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1-6, 2019.
[13]A. Gupta and A. Khare, “Average Spectrum Efficiency of Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) for 5G,” Internataional Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 1-2, 2019.
[14]H. Kim, “Design and Optimization for 5G Wireless Communications,” Hoboken, USA, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 199-200, 2020.