This article delves into the evolving landscape of education technology, with a particular focus on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS). These systems have redefined the educational experience by harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and machine learning to deliver personalized and adaptive learning journeys. While traditional ITS prioritize academic performance, a burgeoning realm of research is exploring the integration of emotional and sentiment analysis into these systems. This article navigates this frontier, shedding light on a novel approach—the survey-based ITS. This innovative concept seeks to support emotional and sentiment analysis within the educational context, emphasizing its potential significance and transformative impact on the field of education. Moreover, this article acknowledges the pivotal role that emotional intelligence (EI) plays in a student`s holistic development and learning trajectory. EI encompasses a spectrum of abilities, including the capacity to recognize, comprehend, and regulate one`s own emotions, as well as those of others. In the educational milieu, cultivating emotional intelligence is essential for fostering a positive and effective learning environment. By seamlessly incorporating emotional analysis into Intelligent Tutoring Systems, educators can gain invaluable insights into students` emotional states, paving the way for more precise and empathetic support. In this regard, this article strives to unveil the multifaceted facets of emotional intelligence in education, underlining its profound significance and offering practical strategies for seamless integration.

Emotional Intelligence, Education Technology, emotional Analysis.

[1]. Goleman, D. Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Bantam, JOURNAL NAME: Psychology, Vol.4, No.4, April 17, 2013
[2]. Brackett, M. A., & Katulak, N. A. Emotional Intelligence in the Classroom: Skill-Based Training for Teachers and Students. In J. Ciarrochi, J. R. Forgas, & J. D. Mayer (Eds.), Emotional Intelligence in Everyday Life: A Scientific Inquiry. Psychology Press, pp.255-273, 2006.
[3]. Elias, M.J., & Arnold, H. The Educator`s Guide to Emotional Intelligence and Academic Achievement: Social-Emotional Learning in the Classroom. Corwin Press. pp.133-145, 2006.
[4]. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, Vol.9, Issue.3, pp.185-211, 1990.
[5]. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions. Child Development, Vol.82, Issue.1, pp.405-432, 2011.
[6]. Zeidner, M., Roberts, R. D., & Matthews, G. The Science of Emotional Intelligence: Current Consensus and Controversies. European Psychologist, Vol.13, Issue.1, pp.64-78, 2008.
[7]. Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., & Salovey, P. Emotional Intelligence: Implications for Personal, Social, Academic, and Workplace Success. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Vol.5, Issue.1, pp.88-103, 2011.
[8]. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol.4, Issue.2, pp.167-207, 1995.
[9]. Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, Vol.56, Issue.4, pp.1023-1031, 2011.
[10]. Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. The knowledge-learning-instruction framework: Bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cognitive Science, Vol.36, Issue.5, pp.757-798, 2012.
[11]. Van Lehn, K. The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, Vol.46, Issue.4, pp.197-221, 2011.
[12]. Baker, R. S., D`Mello, S. K., Rodrigo, M. M. T., & Graesser, A. C. Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners’ cognitive–affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol.68, Issue.4, pp.223-241, 2010.
[13]. Ke, F., & Grabowski, B. Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, Vol.48, Issue.2, pp.89-113, 2007.
[14]. McLaren, B. M., DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. Polysynchronous learning environments: A research framework for the intelligent classroom. Educational Psychology Review, Vol.23, Issue.3, pp.293-319, 2011.
[15]. Roschelle, J., Feng, M., & Murphy, R. F. Designing for more equitable participation: Implications from research on collaborative learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, Vol.10, Issue.1, pp.28-41, 2017.