IEEE Style Citation: A. Radhakrishnan, T. Muralikrishna , “A Study on Architectures for Embedded Devices,” International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.2, Issue.3, pp.80-83, 2014.
MLA Style Citation: A. Radhakrishnan, T. Muralikrishna "A Study on Architectures for Embedded Devices." International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering 2.3 (2014): 80-83.
APA Style Citation: A. Radhakrishnan, T. Muralikrishna , (2014). A Study on Architectures for Embedded Devices. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 2(3), 80-83.
BibTex Style Citation:
@article{Radhakrishnan_2014,
author = {A. Radhakrishnan, T. Muralikrishna },
title = {A Study on Architectures for Embedded Devices},
journal = {International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering},
issue_date = {3 2014},
volume = {2},
Issue = {3},
month = {3},
year = {2014},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {80-83},
url = {https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=74},
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}
RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
UR - https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=74
TI - A Study on Architectures for Embedded Devices
T2 - International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering
AU - A. Radhakrishnan, T. Muralikrishna
PY - 2014
DA - 2014/03/30
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 80-83
IS - 3
VL - 2
SN - 2347-2693
ER -
VIEWS
PDF
XML
3666
3456 downloads
3698 downloads
Abstract
Embedded designers can�t afford �the blue screen of death.� Desktop operating systems can get rebooted every so often, but embedded devices often have to run for years without a single reboot. Devices that are used in medical fields are one of the most appropriate examples in which reliability is more important. Also other embedded devices such as industrial-automation systems, security systems and automotive systems have to be more reliable. And the heart of the embedded system is the processor used in it. In recent days there is a big debate among the embedded device manufacturers in selecting the type of architectures which can be used in their embedded devices. The two most commonly used architectures in embedded devices are X86 and ARM. The decision to chose X86 or ARM needs to be investigated thoroughly based on their advantages and limitations. The selection is not only based on its performance of processors and costs but also on power consumption, the type of hardware and software components that it can support and the type of input and output devices supported. In this paper both the architectures are analyzed.
Key-Words / Index Term
Embedded System, Architectures, ARM, x86
References
[1] ARM Cortex-A9 Technical Reference Manual
[2] Lamber A. et. al., �Keys to Silicon Realization of Gigahertz Performance and Low Power ARM Cortex-A15�, Unpublished.
[3] Intel Atom Processor N400 & N500 Series Datasheet - Volume 1
[4] Emily Blem, Jaikrishnan Menon, and Karthikeyan Sankaralingam �Power Struggles: Revisiting the RISC vs. CISC Debate on Contemporary ARM and x86 Architectures� IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture, ISBN: 978-1-4673-5585-8, Page No (1-12) Feb 23-27, 2013.
[5] Katie Roberts Hoffman and Pawankumar Hedge �ARM Cortex A8 vs. Intel Atom: Architectural and /Benchmark comparisons� Unpublished and available at www.embedded.com/electrical-engineer- community/general/4400497/Cortex-A8-vs--Intel-Atom--Architecture-Benchmark-comparisons
[6] The ARM vs. x86 wars have begun: In-depth power analysis of Atom, Krait & Cortex A15 available at �:http://www.anandtech.com/show/6536/arm-vs-x86-the-real-showdown/.�
[7] D. Bhandarkar and D. W. Clark. �Performance from architecture: comparing a RISC and a CISC with similar hardware organization�, International Conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems ISBN: 0-89791-380-9, Page No (310-319) April 8-11, 1991.
VIEWS
PDF 
XML 
