Every educational organization from medium size to large size hosts Local Area Network (LAN) equipped with machines of different brands with disparate softwares installed on each of them and connected to different hardware devices. It becomes extremely challenging for the lab technician to keep track of hardware and software configuration details of LAN and their working condition. On many occasions the softwares which are rarely used are installed only on few machines of LAN. Thus, for an end user it becomes difficult to search softwares by virtually attending every machine connected to LAN. In the current paper, the authors have designed and developed a model for obtaining information of all computers connected to a workgroup or a domain controller. The hardware and software information on each machine is queried and stored in a centralized relational database management system. The stored information can be queried using Hardware Query Language (HQL) and Software Query Language (SOQL) designed by the authors. Further, to render the queries more user friendly and close to human language fuzzy text parser is designed and implemented which takes care of synonyms and superfluous words with implied meaning into account. The parse tree is developed and parser is tested for few HQL statements.

Domain Controller, Human Computer Interface, MySQL, Parse Tree, Synonyms, Workgroup.

[1]. Klein and C. D. Manning. Natural language grammar induction using a constituent-context model. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 14), pages 35–42, 2002.
[2]. Kudo and Y. Matsumoto. Chunking with support vector machines. In Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics & Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT), pages 1–8, 2001.
[3]. Mnih and G. E. Hinton. Three new graphical models for statistical language modeling, International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 641–648, 2007.
[4]. Ronan Collobert, JasonWeston, L´eon Bottou, Michael Karlen , Koray Kavukcuoglu, Pavel Kuksa, Natural Language Processing (Almost) from Scratch, Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 , pages 2493-2537, 2011.
[5]. Saif Mohammad, Bonnie Dorr, and Graeme Hirst, Computing word-pair antonymy. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, , Honolulu, HI. ACL, pages 982–991, 2008.
[6]. Stanley Kok and Pedro Domingos, Extracting semantic networks from text via relational clustering. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth European Conference on Machine Learning, Antwerp, Belgium. Springer, pages 624–639, 2008.
[7]. Booth, Taylor L. & Richard A. Thompson ,Applying probability measures to abstract languages. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-22.5, pages 442–450, 1973.
[8]. Bod, Rens, Beyond Grammar, CSLI Publications, University of Chicago Press, 1998.
[9]. Xiaoguang Yue, , Guangzhi Di, Yueyun Yu, Wei Wang, Huankai Shi, Analysis of the Combination of Natural Language Processing and Search Engine Technology, Procedia Engineering, Volume 29, International Workshop on Information and Electronics Engineering, pages 1636–1639, 2012
[10]. A Subcategory-based Parser Directed to Generating Representations for Text Understanding, Yukiko Sasaki Alam, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 27, Pages 194–201, 2011.
[11]. Joakim Nivre, Two Strategies for Text Parsing, CSLI Publications, University of Chicago Press
[12]. Peter R. J. Asveld. Fuzzy context-free languages – Part 2: Recognition and parsing algorithms. Theoretical computer science, 347(1):191–213, 2005.
[13]. Rainer Koppler. A systematic approach to fuzzy parsing. Software Practice and Experience, 27:649, 1996
[14]. Kang , Soon Ju, Kwon , Yong Rae, A Tightly Coupled Approach to Fuzzy Syntactic Parsing and Neural Networks for Event-Synchronous Signal Inspection, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 3, No. 3, pages 215-227, 1995.