The aim of the research paper is to study the feedback in the learning and teaching environment of the computer science courses in the higher education sector. This research considers the private college educators and government college educators of a government university. Educator’s opinion is not favourable towards the feedback and evaluation study. The educators view the feedback as threats to their job security. Research shows the negative aspects of feedbacks. There is no use for the constructive purpose of the feedback study in the current scenario. Many private college feedbacks have no scientific background and questionnaire. Interpretation of the feedbacks is not scientific. Only a very few aspects of the research questionnaire gets the attention. Students’ understanding level gets less important than comforting level. The validity and reliability of the feedback study is questionable. Those who are getting the low feedback scores are likely in the mood of resigning their current teaching job and profession. Many educators are not considering the feedback to improve them. Those who are supporting the educational administrator’s views are generally getting priority for further courses of action. This research shows that the feedbacks have direct links with the increments and workload. Those who are getting good feedbacks are likely on the list of the pay hike. This research also shows that there is no proper staff training and remedial measurement and course of action plans available in the current set up. Both entry-level teachers and experienced teachers show no interest in the evaluation process.

Feedback, Teaching and Learning, Remedial Measures, Staff training

[1] Mushraf Hussain, “Students’ feedback: An effective tool in teachers’ evaluation system”, International journal of applied medical research, 2016.
[2] Dona M. Kagan, “Implication of research on teacher belief”, Educational psychologists, Taylor and Francis online, Volume 22, 2010.
[3]Thomas R. Guskey, “Professional development and teacher change”, Educational psychologists, Taylor and Francis online, Volume 1, 2010..
[4] Philip hallinger, “Leading educational change : reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership, Cambridge journal of Education, Taylor and Francis online, Volume 1, 2010.
[5] Christopher Rhode, “Coaching, mentoring, peer- reviewd networking, professional development”, Journal o in service education, Taylor and Francis online, Volume 1, 2006.
[6] John Harland, “teachers’ continuous professional development” Journal o in service education, Taylor and Francis online, Volume 20, 2006
[7] Paul Bredeson, “The school principal’s role in teacher professional development Journal o in service education, Taylor and Francis online, Volume 1, 2006.
[8] Andrew, “Continuous professional development a vision”, Journal of education and work”, Volume 1, 2010
[9] Yasir Hamid, Saji, “Understanding constructive feedback: A commitment between the teachers and students for academic and professional success”, Center for medical education University of scotland, semantic scholar publication, Vol. 60. pp.224-227, 2010.
[10] Tripati Srivastava, sunita, lalith bushan, “Revisiting feedback system practices in FA of indian medical schools”, National journal of Physiology”, vol 5, Issue 1, 2015