Detection of rising topics is currently receiving revived interest impressed by the rapid climb of social networks. during this context, Conventional-term-frequency-based approaches might not be acceptable, as a result of the data changed in social-network posts embody not solely text however conjointly pictures, URLs, and videos. We have a tendency to specialize in emergence of topics signaled by social aspects of those networks. Specifically, we have a tendency to specialize in mentions of user links between users that are generated dynamically (intentionally or unintentionally) through replies, mentions, and retweets. we have a tendency to propose to notice the emergence of a replacement topic from the anomalies measured through the model and propose a chance model of the mentioning behavior of a social network user, and aggregating anomaly scores from many users, we have a tendency to show that we will notice rising topics solely supported the reply/mention relationships in social-network posts. we have a tendency to gathered from Twitter and incontestable the technique in many real knowledge sets. The experiments show that the projected mention-anomaly-based approaches will notice new topics a minimum of as early as text-anomaly-based approaches, and in some cases abundant earlier once the subject is poorly known by the matter contents in posts.

TDT, Anomaly, SDNML, DTO

[1] J. Allan et al., “Topic Detection and Tracking Pilot Study: Final Report,” Proc. DARPA Broadcast News Transcription and UnderstandingWorkshop, 1998.
[2] J. Kleinberg, “Bursty and Hierarchical Structure in Streams,” DataMining Knowledge Discovery, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 373-397, 2003.
[3] Y. Urabe, K. Yamanishi, R. Tomioka, and H. Iwai, “Real-Time Change-Point Detection Using Sequentially Discounting Normalized Maximum Likelihood Coding,” Proc. 15th Pacific-Asia Conf.Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD’ 11),2011.
[4] S. Morinaga and K. Yamanishi, “Tracking Dynamics of Topic Trends Using a Finite Mixture Model,” Proc. 10th ACM SIGKDD Int’l Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 811-816, 2004.
[5] Q. Mei and C. Zhai, “Discovering Evolutionary Theme Patterns from Text: An Exploration of Temporal Text Mining,” Proc. 11th ACM SIGKDD Int’l Conf. Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining,pp. 198-207, 2005.
[6] A. Krause, J. Leskovec, and C. Guestrin, “Data Association for Topic Intensity Tracking,” Proc. 23rd Int’l Conf. Machine Learning(ICML’ 06), pp. 497-504, 2006.
[7] R Shiva Shankar, P.Neelima, V. Priyadarshini and D. Ravibabu “An Object Oriented Approach for Evaluating the Error Correction Coding ,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, (IJERT), ISSN No. 2278-0181, Vol.3,Issue No. 4, pp.1322-1327, 2014.
[8] D. He and D.S. Parker, “Topic Dynamics: An Alternative Model of Bursts in Streams of Topics,” Proc. 16th ACM SIGKDD Int’l Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 443-452, 2010.
[9] H. Small, “Visualizing Science by Citation Mapping,” J. Am. Soc. Information Science, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 799-813, 1999.
[10] D. Aldous, “Exchangeability and Related Topics,” _ Ecole d’ _ Ete´ de Probabilite´s de Saint-Flour XIII—1983, pp. 1-198, Springer, 1985.
[11] Y. Teh, M. Jordan, M. Beal, and D. Blei, “Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes,” J. Am. Statistical Assoc., vol. 101, no. 476, pp. 1566-1581, 2006.
[12] M. Chilakarao, D. Ravibabu and R Shiva Shankar, and “A Realistic And Efficient Information Gathering In Tree Based Wireless Sensor Networks ,” nternational Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, (IJARCS), ISSN No. 0976-5697, Vol.5, No. 2, pp.53-57, 2014.
[13] J. Rissanen, “Strong Optimality of the Normalized ML Models as Universal Codes and Information in Data,” IEEE Trans. Information Theory, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1712-1717, July 2001.
[14] T. Roos and J. Rissanen, “On Sequentially Normalized Maximum Likelihood Models,” Proc. Workshop Information Theoretic Methods in Science and Eng., 2008.
[15] J. Rissanen, T. Roos, and P. Myllyma¨ki, “Model Selection by Sequentially Normalized Least Squares,” J. Multivariate Analysis, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 839-849, 2010.
[16] C. Giurc_aneanu, S. Razavi, and A. Liski, “Variable Selection in Linear Regression: Several Approaches Based on Normalized Maximum Likelihood,” Signal Processing, vol. 91, pp. 1671-1692, 2011.