Open Access   Article Go Back

A Review of Quality Models for Evaluating Quality in Open Source Software

Harvinder Chauhan1 , Anita Ganpati2 , Hardeep Singh3

Section:Review Paper, Product Type: Conference Paper
Volume-04 , Issue-05 , Page no. 38-42, Jul-2016

Online published on Jul 07, 2016

Copyright © Harvinder Chauhan ,Anita Ganpati, Hardeep Singh . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

How to Cite this Paper

  • IEEE Citation
  • MLA Citation
  • APA Citation
  • BibTex Citation
  • RIS Citation

IEEE Style Citation: Harvinder Chauhan ,Anita Ganpati, Hardeep Singh, “A Review of Quality Models for Evaluating Quality in Open Source Software,” International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.04, Issue.05, pp.38-42, 2016.

MLA Style Citation: Harvinder Chauhan ,Anita Ganpati, Hardeep Singh "A Review of Quality Models for Evaluating Quality in Open Source Software." International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering 04.05 (2016): 38-42.

APA Style Citation: Harvinder Chauhan ,Anita Ganpati, Hardeep Singh, (2016). A Review of Quality Models for Evaluating Quality in Open Source Software. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 04(05), 38-42.

BibTex Style Citation:
@article{Chauhan_2016,
author = {Harvinder Chauhan ,Anita Ganpati, Hardeep Singh},
title = {A Review of Quality Models for Evaluating Quality in Open Source Software},
journal = {International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering},
issue_date = {7 2016},
volume = {04},
Issue = {05},
month = {7},
year = {2016},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {38-42},
url = {https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_spl_paper_view.php?paper_id=108},
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}

RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
UR - https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_spl_paper_view.php?paper_id=108
TI - A Review of Quality Models for Evaluating Quality in Open Source Software
T2 - International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering
AU - Harvinder Chauhan ,Anita Ganpati, Hardeep Singh
PY - 2016
DA - 2016/07/07
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 38-42
IS - 05
VL - 04
SN - 2347-2693
ER -

           

Abstract

Open source software (OSS) projects are available in various application domains in a large number. It is difficult to choose any product/project. Quality is a big concern while choosing a software among many of the same type. To measure the quality there are many quality models around us since long. More specifically, from 2003 ,there has been many quality models available in OSS. But how good these quality models are ,remains the question of concern. This research is intended to provide an insight in existing quality models and provide the strength & weakness of these models, thus to provide the OSS community a best suitable quality model. In this paper, the researchers have reviewed the available literature on some conventional quality models and some selective OSS quality models, and carried out a comparative study on these models. In first generation models, open source maturity model embraces the maximum quality characteristics. We concluded that Qual-OSS quality model in second generation is close to international standard organization (ISO) 25010 quality standard. The second generation models offer more tools to support the quality evaluation by considering the community characteristic of OSS.

Key-Words / Index Term

OSS, OSMM, ISO, Qual-OSS, Qualipso, OpenBRR, QSOS, QualOSS, CMM,OSSD

References

[1] Miguel J.P., Mauricio D., and Rodríguez G., “A Review of Software Quality Models for the Evaluation of Software Products”, International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, Vol.5 Issue 6, 2014, pp. 31-53.
[2] Haaland.K, Groven A.K, Regnesentral.N,Glott R,Tannenberg A., “Free/Libre Open Source Quality Models-A comparison between two approaches”, In 4th FLOS International Workshop on Free/Libre/Open Source Software, 2010, pp. 1-17.
[3] Adewumi, Misra S., and Omoregbe N., “A Review of Models for Evaluating Quality in Open Source Software,” 2013 International Conference on Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, IERI Procedia, vol. 4, 2013, pp. 88 – 92.
[4] http://www.sqa.net/iso9126.html ,accessed on May 8,2016.
[5] Adewole A, Misra S., Omoregbe N., “Evaluating Open Source Software Quality Models against ISO 25010 , 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology”, Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing- Pervasive Intelligence and Computing ,pp 872-877.
[6] Garvin, D. A., "What does 'Product Quality' really mean?", Sloan Management Review, no. 1, pp. 25-43, 1984.
[7] ISO/IEC 25010, “Systems and Software Engineering—Systems and Software Product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)— System and Software Quality Models,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2010.
[8] Robson, C., “Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers”, Blackwell Publisher Ltd., 2002.
[9] McCall, J. A., Richards, P. K., and Walters, G. F., "Factors in Software Quality", Nat'l Tech.Information Service, Vol. 1, 2, and 3, 1977.
[10] Boehm Barry W., Brown, J. R, and Lipow, M.,” Quantitative evaluation of software quality, International Conference on Software Engineering”, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Software engineering, 1976.
[11] Boehm, B. W., Brown, J. R., Kaspar, H., Lipow, M., McLeod, G., and Merritt, M.,“Characteristics of Software Quality”, North Holland, 1978.
[12] ISO, International Organization for Standardization, "ISO 9126-1:2001, Software engineering – Product quality, Part 1: Quality model", 2001.
[13] Wijnen - Meijer, M. “Detailed comparison of existing open source software evaluation models”, OSOSS, 2006 http://noiv.nl/files/2009/12/models_comparison_-_1_5.pdf
[14] Wilson, J., “Open Source Maturity Model” 2006,http://www.osswatch.ac.uk/resources/osmm.xml, section 3.
[15] “OSS Watch at the University of Oxford also considers methods like OpenBBR to be useful”,http://www.osswatch.ac.uk/resources/brr.xml, section 4.
[16] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSource_Maturity_Model ,assessed on May 9,2016
[17] M. Soto, and M. Ciolkowski, “The QualOSS open source assessment model measuring the performance of open source communities”. In Proceedings of the 3rd ESEM, 2009, pp. 498–501.
[18] I. Samoladas, G. Gousios, D. Spinellis, and I. Stamelos, “The SQO-OSS quality model: measurement based open source software evaluation”. In Open source development, communities and quality, Springer, 2008, pp. 237-248. .
[19] Bari M. and Djouab R., “Software quality and e-learning,” presented at International Conference on e-Education, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina, September 26-27, 2014
[20] Sung W.J.,Kim Hyeok Ji,Rhew Y. Sung,”A quality Model for open source selection”, Sixth international conference on advanced language processing and web information tecgnology,2007,pg515-518,2007
[21] G.Lott R.,Groven,Haaland K.,Tannenberg,”Quality models for free /libre open source software –towards the ‘silver bullet’?”,2010 36th EUROMICRO conference on software engineering and advanced applications,pg 439-446
[22] Aberdour Mark,”Acheivng quality in open source software ”,IEEE SOFTWARE published by the ieee computer society, Jan 2007.Pg 58-64.